Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Just in the last 5 years:

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Thank you.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

What’s next?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.